Coaching, training and development investment is wasted when it doesn't start with an accurate read of what each person actually needs. Omnicor's talent development service builds the diagnostic foundation: psychometric assessment of existing staff to focus coaching, target training spend, and surface high-potential candidates before they leave.
Development budgets are finite. Generic leadership programmes deliver generic results. The leaders who get the most from coaching are not always the ones who need it most. The high-potentials worth investing in aren't always the high-performers.
Omnicor's talent development assessments answer the practical questions: who in your team has the most to gain from coaching, and on what? Where is generic training the right intervention versus targeted development? Which individuals warrant a meaningful potential investment?
Pre-coaching assessment for an individual leader. Defines the focus of the coaching engagement and provides a baseline for measuring change.
For a leadership team or development cohort. Surfaces team-level patterns and gives each individual their own development priorities.
Identify the candidates worth a serious development investment. Distinguishes high-performance from high-potential , they're not the same thing.
Asks: should we hire / promote / appoint this person? The candidate doesn't always see the report. Focus is on prediction.
Asks: where should this person invest their effort to grow? The candidate is the primary audience for the report. Focus is on insight and action.
The instruments overlap , Hogan, Saville Wave, KFALP work for both purposes , but the interpretation, the feedback session, and the recommendations look entirely different. We're explicit about which mode the engagement is in. Mixing the two is the single most common failure mode in corporate assessment.
The mechanism is targeting: a clearer diagnosis directs coaching and training investment to where it will actually move the needle. For a senior leader, the cost of an assessment is typically a small fraction of the cost of a coaching engagement , and the assessment is what makes the coaching specific rather than generic.
High-performance is about delivering in the current role. High-potential is about capacity to deliver in a more complex future role. The two correlate but are not identical. Some high-performers are at the ceiling of their cognitive complexity; some high-potentials are currently mis-deployed and underperforming. Distinguishing them is the central problem in talent identification.
Resistance is usually a function of how the engagement is framed. When assessment is positioned as development (the report goes to the individual; the conversation is about their growth) rather than evaluation (the report goes to management; the conversation is about their fate), engagement is generally high. We help you frame the programme.
Each team member completes the same battery individually; we then produce both individual development reports and a team-level analysis showing patterns , collective strengths, blind spots, derailer concentrations, motivational fit. The team workshop uses the aggregated data to surface dynamics the team can act on.
Not directly, and we strongly advise against it. Mixing development and evaluation kills engagement with the development process. If your purpose is performance assessment, we'd use different instruments and a different framing , and label it as such.
We'll help you scope a development assessment programme that targets your investment where it matters , and gives every participant something useful for themselves.
Find your assessment solution Speak to a consultant